Gore de France - NYPOST.com
Paris’ bike-share deaths show the importance of caution on NYC streets
By NICOLE GELINAS
Last Updated: 11:10 PM, May 18, 2013
Posted: 10:32 PM, May 18, 2013
As City Hall prepares to roll out bike share, New Yorkers are bickering over dock placement. There’s a more pressing topic: saving lives.
Three people died in Paris’ first year of bike share. New York should heed Paris’ lesson.
Bike share will be a big deal. If each rental bike receives three to five daily uses, anywhere from 16,500 to 27,500 new riders will add themselves daily to the 31,359 cyclists in core Manhattan now.
The city has a special responsibility to new cyclists — because it’s putting them in relative danger.
Sure, cycling is safer than it once was. In a decade, as bicyclists’ numbers have quadrupled, annual deaths haven’t risen.
Paris’ program is very popular—but three died in its first year.
But that’s still 18 people dead last year, including three in Manhattan.
Bicyclists made up 6.5% of people killed in New York crashes, far more than their 1 percent share of people coming into Manhattan by subway, bus or car.
More cycling can make riders collectively safer, by increasing awareness by drivers. But it doesn’t make the individual Citibiker safer if she was doing something far safer — like riding the subway — before.
Yes, London, Washington and Boston have had bike share for couple of years — with no deaths (although London had a critical injury last month).
But Boston and Washington have a fraction of Manhattan’s population density (and expected bike usage). Core London, too, is less dense.
The city closest to us is Paris, with 81% of our population density.
You’ll often hear that bike share in Paris — or “Velib,” for liberty on a bike — has been a hit since its summer 2007 launch. True enough: Go to Paris, and you’ll see older ladies in skirts pedaling with their purses in their baskets just as often as you see thirtysomething males.
What you won’t hear is that Velib had a gruesome rollout.